Biddle v. City of Terrell
Texas Supreme Court
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Judge,
Section B.—This suit is by appellant against appellee to recover on two promissory notes executed by appellee, October 27,1885, one for $1404 and the other for $103, both due nine months after date, bearing interest from date at 8 per cent per annum. These notes were executed by the city of Terrell as the result of a compromise of a certain suit instituted by Hinds & Rousseaux against the city of Terrell to recover balance due on a contract to erect for the city a town hall and school building. The petition among other things alleges that the city refuses to pay the notes and…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- B. L. Nelson & Associates, Inc. v. City of ArgyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Bridgers v. City of LampasasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Peoples v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.