Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thompson v. City of St. Helens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 1985No. 30001, 30034; CA A32162Published

1DissentButtler, P. J.

Because the ordinance became final when it was formally adopted, the appeal period started to run on May 4, 1983, and had expired before the notice of appeal was filed. Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court and therefore dissent.

Concededly, the statutes are confusing, because they deal with appeals of decisions of the justice courts. However, ORS 53.030, 76 Or App at 443, specifies the manner of taking an appeal and requires that a notice of appeal be served within 30 days “after rendition of judgment.” (Emphasis supplied.) Although that language does not appear to be consistent with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Columbia River Television v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Furlong v. TishOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bitte v. City of St. HelensOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API