Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Hazen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 10, 1985No. 83-8-333; CA A32753PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Father appeals a trial court order modifying the parties’ dissolution decree to increase his child support obligation. The sole issue is whether the trial court had in personam jurisdiction over him. We affirm.
The parties were divorced in Washington in 1973. Mother was awarded custody of their child; father was ordered to pay child support. Father is entitled to claim the child as a dependent for income tax purposes so long as his child support payments are current. They are current at this time.
Father is a resident of Ohio. Mother and the child have been residents of Oregon for several…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCaffery v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- In re the Marriage of HornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Carpenter v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Carr v. CarrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- In re Marriage of OberoiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.