Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cabrera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 2016No. 1D15-1821Published

1DissentWinsor, J.

“[I]t is essential that the trustworthiness and reliability requirements of section 90.803(23) be strictly followed.” State v. Townsend, 635 So.2d 949, 957 (Fla.1994). Although the majority upholds the ruling below, it is unable to say that the trial judge-strictly followed the statutory re*776quirements. Because the trial court should not have allowed the hearsay evidence—and because there is no question about its prejudice—our obligation is to reverse and remand for a new trial.1

I

Bernardino Cabrera lived with his girlfriend and the three young sons they had together. The girlfriend’s daughter…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. State v. JanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API