Legal Opinion

State v. Ball

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Ward County Court; Davis, J. George Ball was convicted of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance, in violation of the prohibition law (Pen. Code, c. 65, Rev. Codes 1905), and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

The defendant was convicted in the county court of Ward county of the offense of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance, in violation of the provisions of chapter 65 of the Penal Code (Rev. Codes 1905), and appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Upon being arraigned, he interposed a demurrer to the information upon the following grounds: “(1) That the information does not conform to the requirements of the Revised Codes of the state of North Dakota, in that the same does not state the name of any public offense thereunder. (2) That the information does not state *783sufficient facts to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. ThoemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. CurrieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State v. SeeligNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. O'NealNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. KruseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. McCauleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API