Legal Opinion

Huntington Landmark Adult Community Ass'n v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1989No. G006409Published

1Opinion of the Court

213 Cal.App.3d 1012 (1989)

261 Cal. Rptr. 875

HUNTINGTON LANDMARK ADULT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

EDWARD ROSS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. G006409.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

August 31, 1989.

COUNSEL

Nick O'Malley and James R. Goff for Defendants and Appellants.

Marvin D. Mayer for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SCOVILLE, P.J.

Defendants Shermoen and Ross appeal from an order denying their motion for new trial and from a judgment against them on plaintiff Huntington Landmark Adult Community Association's (HLAC) suit for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API