Legal Opinion
Evans v. Sandy City
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 5, 2019No. 17-4179PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
In 2016, the Sandy City, Utah city council adopted an ordinance making it illegal for any person "to sit or stand, in or on any unpaved median, or any median of less than 36 inches for any period of time." Sandy City Traffic Code, Article 16, Section 299.1 (the Ordinance). After the Sandy City council adopted the Ordinance, Plaintiff-Appellant Steve Ray Evans received four citations for violating the Ordinance when he stood on narrow or unpaved medians. Evans filed suit against the City and many of its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the district court of Utah,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Sgaggio v. DiazDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023