Legal Opinion

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2345 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

Although the manner in which the question here presented arrived is unusual, it is not relevant to the disposition of the case and we will not deal with it. The parties agree that the only question for us to decide is whether the referee made an error of law in finding that the claimant was an employee for the purposes of workmen’s compensation. We find that the referee did not make an error of law and will affirm the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board’s order affirming the referee.

Since there is no real dispute on the facts, the question whether the necessary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bley v. Com., Dept. of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DupesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. BleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wessel v. Mapco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. B & T Trucking v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Wessel v. Mapco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API