Legal Opinion

Sate v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 2026No. 24 BE 0058Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Sate v. Smith,

2026-Ohio-387.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT BELMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENNETH SMITH, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No. 24 BE 0058 Application to Reopen BEFORE: Katelyn Dickey, Carol Ann Robb, Mark A. Hanni, Judges. JUDGMENT: Denied. Atty. J. Kevin Flanagan, Belmont County Prosecutor, and Atty. Jacob A. Manning, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee (No Response Filed) and Kenneth Smith, Defendant-Appellant. Dated: February 6, 2026 –2– PER CURIAM. {¶1} On December 17, 2025,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API