Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 95-1048PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The only issue to be decided at this stage of the case is whether the appellant has raised a “genuine issue” as to his claim that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel, according to the dictates of App.R. 26(B)(5). We express no judgment on appellant’s contention that he was denied his constitutional right to defend himself. Rather, we are concerned solely with the standard of review to be applied when assessing a defendant’s request for reopening an appeal under App.R. 26(B)(5).

In denying the application for reopening, the court of appeals applied the Strickland standard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. William Howard Cross, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Larry Gene Heath v. Charlie Jones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Emile Pierre Duhamel v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CassanoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API