Legal Opinion
Vidurek v. Koskinen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 15, 2019No. 18-2422-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18‐2422‐cv Vidurek v. Koskinen UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Meilleur v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.