Legal Opinion
People v. Reddersen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 7, 2000No. 99SA257PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MARTINEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the prosecution brings this interlocutory appeal from a trial court order suppressing evidence found during a search of the defendant, Christopher Jo Reddersen, and his vehicle. The trial court based the order on its determination that Reddersen’s consent to search was involuntary. The trial court found Reddersen’s consent involuntary because the officer asked to search him without giving him a Miranda advisement while he was in custody. Challenging the order to suppress, the prosecution argues that the trial court’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Vincent Anthony PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.