Legal Opinion

Quigg v. State ex rel. Radel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 2, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

In habeas corpus proceedings before the Circuit Judge it appeared that E. H. Eadel, Jr., was held in custody under a conviction in the municipal court for operating a jitney bus on certain streets, a violation of an ordinance of the city of Miami. The validity of the ordinance was challenged. • To an order of the Circuit Court discharging the petitioner, a writ of error was allowed and taken under the statute. After reciting the conditions that prompted its adoption, the ordinance provides: “That for the purpose of this ordinance, a jitney bus is defined to be any vehicle other than a street…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malone v. City of QuincySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  2. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Ocala Street & Suburban RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Ex parte DavidsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Curry v. OsborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  5. Redman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pennington v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. McAuley v. YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Cutrona v. Mayor of WilmingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  4. Cutrona v. Mayor of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1924
  5. Jewel Tea Co. v. City Council of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API