Cutrona v. Mayor of Wilmington
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
The facts show that the Street and Sewer Department neither suspended nor revoked appellant’s permits to operate his busses over the streets of the City of Wilmington in the transportation of passengers between that city and the town of New Castle and intermediate points, but that such Department, acting under the resolution of March 31, 1922, refused to grant him operating permits for the year 1924.
*440It also appears from such facts that this resolution made it unlawful for the appellant to operate his busses on the streets of the City of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. DukesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Ernest A. DiSabatino & Ernest DiSabatino & Sons, Inc. v. EllisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Drexler v. CommissionersCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1926
- De Pace v. Mayor and Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
- De Pace v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.