Legal Opinion

Earl v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1908No. 15,578PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Riley district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Per curiam

The demurrer to the petition was properly overruled. We find nothing substantial in the claim of error in the admission of testimony. Besides, the cause was tried to the court without a jury.

There was no abuse of discretion in appointing a guardian ad litem and permitting him to file an answer after the evidence was introduced and before the case was finally «decided, nor in approving the service 'of publication on the other defendants after the evidence was submitted.

The other assignments of error relate to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence. On a material issue of fact there was a…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FererCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Mayfield, Gdn. v. RumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Ritzler v. EckleberryOhio Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Stewart v. FererCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API