Ritzler v. Eckleberry

The error assigned herein is that the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the finding and judgment of the Common Pleas Court.

The reasons given by the Court of Appeals in the opinion of the court are stated as follows:

“The instant case varies from the cases cited in that a guardian ad litem was appointed before judgment. However, the appointment was made after both plaintiffs and defendant had rested their respective cases. The guardian ad litem had no opportunity whatsoever to do anything in defense of the infant defendant. It matters not that the infant defendant was in fact represented by…