Legal Opinion
In Re O'Neil
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 28, 2010No. 2009-231PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
The respondent, Eugene E. O’Neil, Jr., challenges numerous rulings entered by the Concord Family Division in divorce proceedings with the petitioner, Dawn M. O’Neil, including: (1) restraining orders restricting his presence at the family court and at his workplace; (2) orders relating to the disposition of marital assets; (3) orders denying motions to disqualify a certain presiding judge; and (4) orders relating to alimony, wage assignment and the final divorce. We affirm.
I
The facts of this case are involved and relate to proceedings surrounding the parties’ divorce. The petitioner commenced…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Skwira v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Bean v. Red Oak Property Management, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re MullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- D'Angelo v. New Hampshire Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- In re MallettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Holloway Automotive Group v. LucicSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State of New Hampshire v. Steven LauxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.