Legal Opinion

Directv, Inc. v. Michael Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 28, 2004No. 03-16094PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This case presents an issue of first impression for this Court that has created a split among the circuits: whether an award of liquidated damages, under 18 U.S.C. section 2520(c)(2), for a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (Wiretap Act) is mandatory or discretionary. DIRECTV, Inc. (DTV) obtained a permanent injunction against Michael Brown and a judgment of $3886.64 of actual damages, under 47 U.S.C. section 605, plus attorney’s fees and costs, but the district court refused to award DTV liquidated damages of $10,000 under section 2520(c)(2) of the Wiretap Act.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. VealCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States Ex Rel. Osheroff v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Friends of the Everglades v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Directv, Inc. v. Jeff BuddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API