Legal Opinion
McKinney v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 12, 1932No. 6 Div. 148PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.
We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.
Writ denied.
BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hardy v. First Nat. Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. HimrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Tennessee, A. & G. Ry. v. CardonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937