Tennessee, A. & G. Ry. v. Cardon

GARDNER, Justice.

We have had frequent occasion to note the limited review of this court of the decisions of the Court of Appeals. McKinney v. State, 225 Ala. 7, 141 So. 706; Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod, 226 Ala. 342, 147 So. 163; Folmar v. State, 217 Ala. 410, 116 So. 112.

There is no review of the facts in the opinion by the Court of Appeals, nor separate treatment of any questions here argued relating to the proof. The opinion is, 'as we see it, to be properly interpreted as holding that if any error intervened in relation to any such question it was without injury, or, as stated in the…