Legal Opinion

Mark Andrew Biltz v. Google, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 27, 2018No. 5:18-cv-04094Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I MARK ANDREW BILTZ, CIVIL NO. 18-00059 DKW-KJM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. INTRODUCTION On February 22, 2018, Plaintiff Mark Andrew Biltz, proceeding pro se, filed a First Amended Complaint against Alphabet Inc., Google Inc., Google AdWords, and Sundar Pichai, alleging claims for breach of contract and fraud.1 Dkt. No. 7. Biltz asserts that Defendants fraudulently created a false “ad campaign,” evidenced by altered invoices, in order to conceal the terms of a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API