Legal Opinion
David v. Atlantic Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 9, 1943No. 29943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is stated in the briefs of both parties that the controlling question in this case is whether the settlement agreement between them is valid and whether it precludes the plaintiff from maintaining this action. Counsel for the plaintiff contends that the agreement is void in that it is a contract against the public policy of the State, and he cites, among others, the following cases: Fleming v. Warshawsky, 123 Fed. (2d) 622; Wilkinson v. Noland, 40 Fed. Supp. 1009; Travis v. Ray, 41 Fed. Supp. 6; U. S. v. Morley, 98 Fed. (2d) 781; Hutchinson v. Barry, 44…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belt v. LazenbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Preston v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- City Electric Railway Co. v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Parker v. Fulton Loan & Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Matter of CottonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1991
- Leathers v. Robert Potamkin Cadillac Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Seymour v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Coleman v. Ellenberg (In re Cohen)District Court, D. Georgia · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.