Legal Opinion

Honick v. Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided October 14, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00637Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION LOUIS HONICK and CANDICE HONICK, Plaintiffs, v. Case No: 2:21-cv-637-SPC-NPM ACE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant Ace Insurance Company of the Midwest’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18). Plaintiffs Louis and Candice Honick (together, “Honick”) did not timely respond. Local Rule 3.01(c). So the Court considers the Motion unopposed. Id. And it simply decides whether the Complaint states a claim based on the papers in the record. Giummo v. Olsen,

701 F. App’x 922, 924-25

(11th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Julian Almanza v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLINGLER ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
Giummo v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.