Day v. Day
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sutton, Justice.
1. “A petition asking that a verdict and decree be set aside because rendered on the perjured testimony of a named witness does not set forth a cause of action for that reason, where the petition also fails to allege that the witness has been duly convicted of . . . perjury with ■ respect to such testimony, and that the verdict and decree were based on that testimony alone.” Hubbard v. Whatley, 200 Ga. 751, 757 (38 S. E. 2d 738); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 206 Ga. 540 (2) (57 S. E. 2d 668); Code § 110-706. The ground of the husband’s motion to set aside the verdict and decree,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Jeffrey v. JeffreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Hubbard v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Greene v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.