Legal Opinion

Day v. Day

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 9, 1954No. 18497PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sutton, Justice.

1. “A petition asking that a verdict and decree be set aside because rendered on the perjured testimony of a named witness does not set forth a cause of action for that reason, where the petition also fails to allege that the witness has been duly convicted of . . . perjury with ■ respect to such testimony, and that the verdict and decree were based on that testimony alone.” Hubbard v. Whatley, 200 Ga. 751, 757 (38 S. E. 2d 738); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 206 Ga. 540 (2) (57 S. E. 2d 668); Code § 110-706. The ground of the husband’s motion to set aside the verdict and decree,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Jeffrey v. JeffreySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Hubbard v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Greene v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API