Jeffrey v. Jeffrey
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is insisted that the verdict is excessive. There was evidence that, though the husband’s base pay was larger, his net “take-home” pay was $100.35 per week. That he had to travel most of the time «and was allowed $6 per day expenses while away from his headquarters, though the $6 per day was two or three dollars less than his expenses incurred. His estimate was that he was away about 17 days a month. Computing his weekly pay into monthly pay, it would be $434.20 per month, $34 of which would be used to cover expenses at $2 per…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Bateman v. BatemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Fitts v. FittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Wills v. WillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.