Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided January 15, 1909No. 8927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
Per the purpose of acquiring land for what is commonly known .as the new barge canal, the State, through its authorized officer and pursuant to law, on or about the 26th day of October, 1906, served upon the claimant the usual map and notice of appropriation, wherein the property sought to be appropriated is described as follows:
All that piece or parcel of land “ situated, lying and being in the town of Whitehall, County of Washington and State of Hew York, as shown in the accompanying Map and described as follows: ‘ Beginning at an iron pipe in the property line between the land of Jane…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Strohm v. . the N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Bell Telephone Co. v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Slingerland v. . International Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Stowers v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Improved Premises Known as No. 46-70 McLean AvenueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Queens Terminal Co. v. SchmuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911