Legal Opinion

Paulson v. Meinke

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1986No. Civ. 11082PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

In well-traveled litigation, we partially reverse the third trial judge’s decision. We order an implied trust where unjust enrich*799ment results from transfer of a 295 acre farm and new home to the claimant’s brother, now deceased, who only assumed a mortgage balance and who agreed to an “option to repurchase.”

In 1981, Oscar and June Paulson sought an implied trust against land in both LaM-oure and Ransom Counties which they had deeded to Oscar’s brother, Claire, in 1977. After the first trial before Judge Fredricks, who rejected their claim, Paulsons moved for a new trial or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bodding v. HermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. McGhee v. MergenthalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Schroeder v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Black v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API