Legal Opinion
Ex parte Baker
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 7, 1934No. 17308PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
The relator was tried and convicted in the corporation court of the city of Temple for a violation of an ordinance duly enacted by the City Commission of said City, which ordinance we will not undertake to set out in full but merely copy the caption and such sections and subsections as we deem necessary to be considered in disposing of this case.
The caption reads as follows:
“An Ordinance regulating and licensing certain persons ■engaged in the business of itinerant vendors of certain products and goods in the city of Temple, Texas; defining itinerant vendors; fixing license…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Ex parte DeedsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Matter of Application of HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Ideal Tea Co. v. SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hurt v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Ex Parte DreibelbisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Linen Service Corp. of Texas v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Miskell v. Termplan Incorporated of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Cortes v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.