Legal Opinion

State v. Fletcher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2017No. 94329-0Published

1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCLOUD, J.

*220¶ 1 If a criminal defendant is acquitted due to insanity, the judge must then decide what to do with him or her. An acquitted person who constitutes a substantial danger to others, or who presents a substantial likelihood of committing criminal acts jeopardizing public safety or security unless kept under further control of the court, other persons, or institutions, "shall" be committed under our state's involuntary commitment statute. RCW 10.77.110(1). If those safety concerns *286disappear, the insanity acquittee must be released. Either the Department *221of Social and Health Services (DSHS) or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API