Legal Opinion
Cobb v. Intel Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 4, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00416Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON DANIEL COBB, Ca se No. 3:21-cv-00416-AR Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. _____________________________________ ARMISTEAD, Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Daniel Cobb brings this action against defendant Intel Corporation, his former employer, asserting three claims: wrongful discharge of his employment based on his age, violating ORS § 659A.030, and retaliation against him because he reported age discrimination Page 1 – OPINION AND ORDER and nepotism, violating ORS §§ 659A.030(1)(f) and 659A.199(1). Intel moves for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.