Legal Opinion

United States v. Hatfield

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 2009No. 09-2556PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Following a two-day trial, a jury found Scott Hatfield guilty of possessing child pornography, see 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), and he was sentenced to a below-guidelines term of 84 months in prison. Hatfield appeals, but his appointed counsel reports that he cannot identify any nonfrivolous issues on appeal and therefore seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel’s supporting brief is facially adequate, and Hatfield did not respond to our invitation to comment on his lawyer’s submission. See Cir. R. 51(b). We confine our…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Loumard HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Christopher EadsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. USA v. Jonathan TanguayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  3. United States v. TanguayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API