Legal Opinion
Kayden v. Ford Motor Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 2017No. WD 80165PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames Edward Welsh, Presiding Judge
Plaintiff/Appellant Helen Kayden (“Kay-den”) appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County granting-summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Respondent Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) on Kayden’s petition. The circuit court found that Kayden was a “statutory employee” of Ford when she was injured and her exclusive remedy against Ford is the Missouri’s Workers’ Compensation Act. The -circuit court accordingly granted summary judgment in favor of Ford finding that the court lacked the statutory authority to proceed. Kayden now appeals. We affirm.
Factual Background
Kayden’s action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. The Estate of Theodore R. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Daoukas v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Billy Hood v. Michael Menech, Vandalia Area Historical Society and Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Donald Brooks v. William J. Laurie and Crown Center Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- LME, Inc. v. Robert Powell and Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Lucille Schoen v. Mid-Missouri Mental Health Center and Treasure of The State of Missouri- Custodian of The Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019