Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Buder

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

271 U.S. 461 (1926)

EX PARTE BUDER.

___, Original.

Supreme Court of United States.

Motion submitted March 1, 1926.

Denied June 1, 1926.

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS.

Mr. James T. Blair for petitioner.

2Opinion of the Court · BrandeisJustice Brandeis

This is a motion by Buder and other taxing officers of the City of St. Louis for leave to file in this Court a petition for a writ of mandamus against the federal District Judge of the Eastern Division of the Eastern Judicial District of Missouri; or, in the alternative, for a writ of certiorari to that court; and for a rule to show cause why such writs should not issue. The…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by44 opinions

  1. Maryland Citizens for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  2. Otten v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Juan T. Penagaricano, Acting Economic Stabilization Administrator v. Allen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  4. 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 247, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9647 George C. Wicks, and v. Southern Pacific Co. (Pacific Lines), and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Intervenor and Philip F. Jensen, and v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., a Corporation, and Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees, Intervenor AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Osage Tribe of Indians v. IckesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API