Legal Opinion
In re Franklin Wireless Corp. Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 18, 2024No. 3:21-cv-01837Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 In re FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP. Case No.: 21-cv-1837-AJB-MSB DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 12 ORDER: 13 (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 14 MOTION FOR SUMMARY 15 ADJUDICATION AND 16 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 17 MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT MR. 18 BENJAMIN P. EDWARDS 19 20 (Doc. Nos. 53, 54) 21 22 23 24 Before the Court are Defendants’ motion for summary adjudication and motion to 25 exclude Plaintiffs’ expert. (Doc. Nos. 53, 54.) The motions are fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 26 56, 59, 62, 63, 87.) For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.