Legal Opinion

Henry Molignaro v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1969No. 25784PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This habeas case involves the duty of a trial court to inform an accused of the consequences of pleading guilty to an indictment for child molesting. The question is whether, before accepting a waiver of the right to counsel, the trial court should have informed the accused that a guilty plea carried a maximum possible sentence of twenty years. We reverse the district court’s denial of the writ. In the absence of a showing that the petitioner was informed of the possible punishment he faced, we hold that there was no knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Marvin Joe Cooper and Archie Kerry Cooper v. Carl Griffin, Sheriff, Chatham County and Luke Sims, Jailer, Chatham County Jail, Chatham County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. State of Missouri v. Virgil Lewis TurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Frank Preston AkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Perry Goodwin v. S. Lamont Smith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API