Henry Molignaro v. Lamont Smith, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Reidsville, Georgia
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
This habeas case involves the duty of a trial court to inform an accused of the consequences of pleading guilty to an indictment for child molesting. The question is whether, before accepting a waiver of the right to counsel, the trial court should have informed the accused that a guilty plea carried a maximum possible sentence of twenty years. We reverse the district court’s denial of the writ. In the absence of a showing that the petitioner was informed of the possible punishment he faced, we hold that there was no knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Marvin Joe Cooper and Archie Kerry Cooper v. Carl Griffin, Sheriff, Chatham County and Luke Sims, Jailer, Chatham County Jail, Chatham County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- State of Missouri v. Virgil Lewis TurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Frank Preston AkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Perry Goodwin v. S. Lamont Smith, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.