Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Luddeke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1934No. 9331Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

This court feels obliged, upon consideration of appellant’s motion for rehearing, to adhere to the original disposition and the opinion thereon. The defects in and omissions from appellant’s brief, and pointed out in the original opinion, are sought to be cured and supplied in the motion for rehearing. But that effort comes too late. Parties are bound by and restricted to the presentation in their briefs. Any other rule would result in disorder, confusion, delays, the disruption of orderly procedure in this court. This is too obvious to require argument to support it.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Everett & LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Neal v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Bertram v. Reed Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Jones v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Hardin v. PalmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API