Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. King Soopers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 13, 2007No. 06-9514PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) petitions for enforcement of two June 2005 Orders, 344 N.L.R.B. No. 103 (2005) and 344 N.L.R.B. No. 104 (2005), issued against Respondent King Soopers, Inc. (“King Soopers”). The Board concluded King Soopers violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) by failing to provide documents and information in response to requests from two separate unions-the United Food and Commercial Workers, Local No. 7 (“UFCW” or “Local 7”), Case No. 06-9514, and the Paper Allied Industrial Chemical Energy Workers…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009