Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keeling v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1965No. 146-63Published

1DissentDavis, Judge

Unlike the court, I find that the Civil Service Commission abused its discretion when it refused the plaintiff the right to reinstate his appeal to that body. The regulation (5 C.F.E. § 22.305) provided for the reopening of a “closed appeal”, in the Commission’s discretion, “upon a showing that circumstances beyond the control of the appellant prevented him from prosecuting the appeal.” The Commission’s Board of Appeals and Beview read this, too narrowly, *254as requiring proof that plaintiff was actually prevented by external forces from prosecuting his appeal. The regulation, in my opinion, is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. ZuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. ZuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Curtis W. Garrott v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Chisholm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API