Legal Opinion
Katz v. Shapiro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Staley, Jr., J.
Petitioners are duly licensed operators of private proprietary homes for adults (PPHA) as defined in subdivision 26 of section 2 of the Social Services Law which provide suitable care, for compensation and profit, to persons who, though not *233requiring medical or nursing care, are in such condition by reason of their age, infirmities or disabilities as to require, in addition to lodging and board, the services of attendants to assure their safety and comfort, and to enable them to be bathed, dressed, fed or to move about.
Pursuant to the provisions of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Yonkers Community Development Agency v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- MATTER OF TAYLOR v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Katz v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Kupferman v. New York State Board of Social WelfareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New York State Ass'n of Career Schools v. State Education Department of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- State v. Hudson Home for the AgedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Silvian v. ShangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979