Legal Opinion

(2004)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided January 5, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Susan M. Erlichman, Esquire

Your predecessor asked for our opinion whether a domestic employee who resides in the employer's residence may receive guests, including religious leaders, medical personnel, and lawyers, at that residence. The inquiry posed two questions:

1. Does a live-in domestic employee have tenancy rights, including the right to invite and receive guests, if the employee is required to live at the employer's residence as a condition of employment and the employee is compensated in part by the employer's provision of room and board?

2. Would the live-in employee's rights be…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Green v. T. A. Shoemaker & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  4. Mackenzie v. MinisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. White v. KellerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API