Legal Opinion
S.C.W. v. C.B.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 12, 2001No. 1001107PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
S.C.W. (“the biological father”) appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals from a judgment granting the petition for adoption filed in this case by R.E.L. and C.A.L. (“the adoptive parents”). The juvenile court held that the biological father’s failure to comply with the Putative Father Registry Act, §§ 26-10C-1 and -2, Ala. Code 1975 (“the Registry Act”), constituted his implied consent to the adoption of his biological child. P.D. and S.D.H., the biological father’s attorneys, appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals from a judgment sanctioning them pursuant to the Alabama Litigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Ex Parte SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- PACIFIC ENT. OIL v. Howell PetroleumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- United States v. Charles R. McLemoreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- K.L.B. v. W.M.F.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- L.T. v. W.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- J.N.F. v. A.S.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- M.M. v. K.J.Z.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.