Legal Opinion

Feusner v. Farley

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1959No. 2861, 2862Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION.

2Opinion of the Court · HarnsbergerJustice Harnsberger

C. R. Farley and Shelby Gibler each brought their separate actions against defendants. As their claims were identical against the same defendants and would be determined upon the same evidence, the cases were consolidated for trial and will similarly be disposed of in this court.

Plaintiffs claimed defendants Roy H. Feusner and Wayne L. Feusner, his son, orally agreed with Farley and Gibler to engage with them in a joint prospecting and mining venture. The Feusners were to pay Gibler $850 per month and Farley $10 per day and all expenses. Farley was to furnish his jeep and certain…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  3. Blackner v. McDermottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Mattikow v. SudarskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API