Legal Opinion

Mattikow v. Sudarsky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1928PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.

Since the trial of this case the original defendant Eleazer Cedar died, and his personal representatives have been substituted as defendants. He is referred to herein as defendant. The trial court has found that plaintiff and defendant made an oral agreement to form a partnership for the purchase of real estate, plaintiff contributing his knowledge, and defend ant the necessary cash, the profits to be equally divided after paying defendant his advances with interest, and the plaintiff having the right at any time to receive a conveyance of one-half interest in lands so purchased upon payment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Fairchild v. . FairchildNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Traphagen v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Pounds v. EgbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Bristol v. WoodwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Backus Plywood Corporation v. Commercial Decal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API