Legal Opinion

State v. Chapman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant appealed from a conviction of perjury. The claimed perjury arose out of defendant’s testimony while being tried for the crime of contributing to the delinquency óf a minor. He was charged in the contributing case with removing the clothing, fondling the breasts, and having sexual intercourse on the 30th day of October, 1966, with a female under the age of 18 years. His testimony, which was claimed to have been perjury, was that on the 30th of October: (1) he did not see the prosecutrix at a certain residence, (2) he never went into the bedroom of that residence, and (3) he did not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PooleOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. GreenlawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API