Hoge v. Soissons
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LLOYD, J.
Various grounds of negligence are alleged in her amended petition, some of which are conclusions rather than allegations of fact and might well have been ordered to be made definite and certain as requested by the defendants Hoge and Nezbeda in a motion filed by them in the Court of Common Pleas, but since this court must reverse the judgment on other grounds, the ruling on this motion ceases to be of any practical moment, because as a result of the trial the plaintiffs in error are now fully advised as to all of the contentions and claims made by the defendant in error.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MacHaterre v. DushaOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nomina v. EggemanPutnam County Court of Common Pleas · 1962