Armitage v. Fisher
New York Supreme Court
Motion to continue an injunction granted pendente lite. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMath am, J.
This is an application upon an order to show cause why a pendente lite injunction heretofore granted in ' this action should not be continued until the final hearing and determination of the same.
The action is prosecuted by the plaintiff, who is an alderman and president of the board of aldermen of the city of Albany, against the other members of the. common council of the city of Albany, to restrain and enjoin them from acting upon any report of a committee appointed to consider and report upon charges made against the plaintiff in such wise as to remove the plaintiff from his office and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The People Ex Rel. Negus v. . DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Nichols v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Cushing v. RuslanderNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Palmer v. FoleyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1873
- Andrae v. RedfieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stahlhut v. BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897