Legal Opinion

Andrae v. Redfield

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided January 19, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[In. equity. Bill by Otto Andrae and Bern-hard Andrae, trading as Andrae & Co., and others, against Constance C. Redfield, executrix, and Frank B. Redfield, executor, of Heman J. Redfield, deceased, to enjoin the plea of the statute of limitations in certain suits pending at law. Heard on demurrer to the bill. Bill dismissed. Plaintiffs after-wards appealed to' the supreme court, and the decree was affirmed. Andreae v. Red-field, 98 U. S. 225.]

1Opinion of the Court

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

The bill of complaint herein is filed by the several plaintiffs in sixty separate actions at law, each brought to recover from the defendant an alleged excess of duty, illegally- exacted by the defendant while collector of the port of New York. The payment of the various amounts exacted in excess of duty is alleged to have been made under protest, by the respective plaintiffs in the actions at law, dt various dates in the years 1853, 1854, 1855, 1856 and 1857. It is not stated in the bill on what precise day the said several sixty actions at law were commenced, but it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Ex Parte Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. California Fig-Syrup Co. v. PutnamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1895
  2. Armitage v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hennequin v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API