Legal Opinion

Mackie v. Schoenstadt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1923No. 15113PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

This appeal is from a decree for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The bill originally-filed January 5, 1920, by Edith M. Mackie, appellee, made Herman Schoenstadt, his sons, Henry and Arthur, and his daughter, Bertha, defendants. An amended bill was filed on December 5, 1921, which was answered. The answer averred the contract of sale was procured by complainant and her agent by misrepresentations and inequitable conduct and by violating a certain agreement, that the contract had been abandoned by the parties, and that complainant had been guilty of laches.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cohen v. SegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Woodrow v. QuaidIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bauer v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Laegeler v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Parker v. DameikaIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hotze v. SchlanserIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rootberg v. Richard J. Brown AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API