Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Commissioner, Department of Income Maintenance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 11, 1987No. 13101PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The primary issue in this appeal and cross appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering that the case be remanded to the defendant, the commissioner of the department of income maintenance, for a “new full hearing” on the plaintiff Meta Harrison’s application for assistance under the title XIX medical assistance program (Medicaid). 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq;1 General Statutes §§ 17-134a et seq. We find no error.
The underlying facts are not in dispute. On August 3, 1984, the plaintiff applied to the defendant for benefits pursuant to Medicaid. Prior to filing the application, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lavine v. MilneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Hospital of St. Raphael v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Phelps Dodge Copper Products Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. CarothersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Raines v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Clark v. Commissioner of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Matarazzo v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.