Legal Opinion
Morrissey v. Noem
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1297Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES P. MORRISSEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-1297 (TSC) MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff James P. Morrissey alleges that his employer, the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), failed to reasonably accommodate him after he underwent surgery, and otherwise retaliated against him for his complaints about “the corruption that persists within DHS.” Compl. ¶¶ 70, 74, 78, ECF No. 1. Defendant Markwayne Mullin, the Secretary of Homeland Security, now moves to dismiss. See Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 5…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Jones v. BernankeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.